Billing companies that work gastroenterology claims every day. Describe your practice once and compare their proposals.
A few questions about the practice, then billing companies that fit send proposals. You are not committing to anything.
Hand off all of it or just the parts that are breaking. Say which in the form so the proposals match.
Charges entered, claims checked against payer edits, and sent daily so clean claims go out the first time.
Every denial worked, appealed, or corrected, with the root cause tracked so the same denial stops repeating.
Old balances called on and worked by payer and by age until they are paid, adjusted, or written off on purpose.
Certified coders assign CPT, ICD-10, and modifiers from your notes, or audit the codes your providers pick.
New providers enrolled with payers, CAQH kept current, and revalidations handled before they lapse.
Statements, online payment, payment plans, and the phone calls that come with them, handled in your name.
Eligibility checks, prior authorizations, and old AR cleanup go through the same request. If you only need one piece, say so.
There is no right answer for every practice. The usual tradeoffs:
Colonoscopy billing looks simple until the first claim comes back. The same procedure can be screening, surveillance, or diagnostic depending on one diagnosis pointer, and the patient's cost share changes with each. Polyp removal during a screening is the classic trap: the code moves from 45378 to 45385 or 45380, the payer flips the claim to diagnostic, and the patient gets a bill they were told would be zero. Modifier 33 and PT help on some plans and mean nothing on others. A biller who has not memorized which payers want which has been guessing, and you are paying for the guesses.
EGD and colonoscopy on the same day bring multiple procedure reductions, and modifier 59 or its X variants get overused until payers start auditing for it. Anesthesia is its own fight. Propofol sedation for average-risk patients gets denied by plans that consider moderate sedation sufficient, and the anesthesia group's claim and yours have to agree on the diagnosis or both get stuck. Pathology adds another layer if you run an in-office lab: 88305 volumes draw scrutiny, and the global versus technical component split has to be right.
Then there is the drug side. Infliximab and its biosimilars, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab for IBD patients need prior authorization, benefit verification, and a decision about buy and bill versus specialty pharmacy. Add capsule endoscopy, motility testing, FibroScan, and a hepatology clinic, and you have a practice with five revenue streams that each deny for different reasons. Most in-house staff handle the procedure side well and let the infusion and ancillary AR rot. Outsourcing makes sense for GI when your denials are concentrated in screening conversions, anesthesia, or infusions and nobody on your staff owns them. Tell bidders if you own an ASC, if you run pathology or infusion in house, and how many physicians scope each week. Compare how each proposal handles the screening-to-diagnostic appeal. A biller who has no clear answer there will not hold up on the rest.
Three steps. Most practices hear from the first billing company within a business day.
Specialty, providers, claim volume, your software, and what you want handled.
Your request goes to billing companies that work your specialty and take on practices your size.
Compare fees, scope, reporting, and contract terms side by side. Pick one, or none.
What practice managers usually ask before they fill out the form.
Describe the practice once and compare proposals from billing companies that fit. No obligation.
Request proposals